<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>frenergy.ca - Free Renewable Energy &#187; Getting Off Oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frenergy.ca/category/getting-off-oil/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frenergy.ca</link>
	<description>free energy, renewable energy, biofuel, biogas, electric car, gas to electric, water fuel cell, radiant energy, technology, zero emissions, getting off oil, not a drop of oil, oil free, running on water</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to convert 1 gallon of liquid gasoline into 160 gallons of highly combustible fuel vapor</title>
		<link>http://frenergy.ca/technology-available-today-to-convert-1-gallon-of-liquid-gasoline-into-160-gallons-of-highly-combustible-fuel-vapor.html</link>
		<comments>http://frenergy.ca/technology-available-today-to-convert-1-gallon-of-liquid-gasoline-into-160-gallons-of-highly-combustible-fuel-vapor.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W Kincaid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting Off Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kincaids.ca/frenergy/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much does 1 gallon of liquid gasoline displace as a vapor? The saturated vapor volume of an average gallon of liquid gasoline when fully evaporated is 160 gallons of vapor at 60° F and sea level. When you convert 1 gallon of gasoline into 160 gallons of highly combustible fuel vapor you increase your [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_41" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/oil-rig-gas-vapor-flaring.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-41" title="oil rig gas vapor flaring" alt="" src="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/oil-rig-gas-vapor-flaring.jpg" width="480" height="352" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Offshore oil rigs flare the energy equivalent of 40 to 60 billion gallons of gasoline each year.</p></div>
<p>How much does 1 gallon of liquid gasoline displace as a vapor? The saturated vapor volume of an average gallon of liquid gasoline when fully evaporated is 160 gallons of vapor at 60° F and sea level. When you convert 1 gallon of gasoline into 160 gallons of highly combustible fuel vapor you increase your nation&#8217;s fuel supply by 16,000% (16,000% of 1 is 160). If you paid $5 for just one gallon of liquid gasoline you would actually only be paying $0.03 (3 cents) per gallon of fuel vapor.</p>
<p>How can you convert 1 gallon of liquid gasoline fuel into 160 gallons of gasoline vapor and increase your fuel supply by 16,000%?  There are two known and proven ways to convert liquid gasoline into fuel vapor.  One is to heat the liquid fuel before it enters the engine.  The other is using ultrasonic nebulizer technology.</p>
<p>If liquid fuel is heated to a temperature of 450 degrees F, the fuel is fractionalized by catalytic cracking and converted to smaller light molecular hydrocarbons, methane and methanol. Where can you get this kind of heat in order to fractionalize liquid fuel? Manifolds and exhaust pipes <em>can reach temperatures of</em> 500°F to 1000°F.</p>
<p>It is a well documented fact that air pollution from internal combustion engines is caused by unburned carbon fuel. Today, all gasoline powered vehicles burn only finely divided particles or droplets that are sprayed from the carburetor or fuel injectors, into the engine cylinders. This is a very wasteful process of converting gasoline or diesel to energy. 20-30 % efficiency at best. Converting liquid gasoline to a gasoline vapors will easily give 5 times the mpg and near zero emissions.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 480px"><img class="   " title="Lean fuel mixture carburetor" alt="" src="http://www.ustudy.in/sites/default/files/images/carburettor.jpg" width="470" height="303" /><p class="wp-caption-text">In the old days engines ran very lean as demonstrated by the fuel needle valve. In the old days just 1 tiny needle valve did the work of 6 to 8 fuel injectors. In the old days all engines ran on a much leaner amount of (less) fuel.</p></div>
<p>All internal combustion engines were made to run on highly combustible vapor, not liquid. It is well known that fuel-lean running improves the fuel efficiency of all vehicles. In the old days, under cruising conditions, the carburetor engines always ran lean – about 15% excess air. In the old days liquid fuel was reduced (made leaner) to finely divided particles or droplets before they enter the combustion chamber above the pistons. The carburetors reduced the liquid fuel into a very lean fuel mist before the fuel entered the combustion chamber above the pistons. Very high gas mileage is achieved by simply reducing liquid fuel into what all combustion engine need &#8211; gas vapor.</p>
<p>Vapor burns much cleaner than gasoline and has a higher octane rating. A lean running engine (ie, an engine using more air than fuel) has a cooler combustion process than the typical ECM engine with a preset (never deviating) chemically correct mixture of 14.6 air : 1 fuel. Running cooler is also better for the engines. Cooler running engines means a reduction in heat damage and failure.</p>
<p>In the early 1930s, Charles Nelson Pogue equipped a Ford V8 coupe with a vapor carburetor he designed and built and got over 200 MPG. He drove the V8 Ford from Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada to Vancouver B.C. Canada. He traveled 1879.5 miles on just 14.5 gallons of gasoline (the entire distance on just 3/4 of a 20 gallon tank of fuel) A standard carburetor used 106.5 gallons (or five, 20 gallon tanks of fuel) on the same trip.</p>
<p>In 1977, Tom Ogle demonstrated a 351 ci. Ford getting over 100 miles per gallon. He used a multiple fuel vaporizing system that had a 3 gallon tank. His system used heat to vaporize the liquid fuel. He received patent number <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PALL&amp;RefSrch=yes&amp;Query=PN%2F4177779" target="_blank">4,177,779</a> on Dec. 11, 1979, which described &#8220;<em>A fuel economy system for an internal combustion engine which, when installed in a motor vehicle, obviates the need for a conventional carburetor, fuel pump and gasoline tank. The system operates by using the engine vacuum to draw fuel vapors from a vapor tank through a vapor conduit to a vapor equalizer which is positioned directly over the intake manifold of the engine.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>An ultrasonic nebulizer can also convert liquid fuel into a vapor. Liquids such as water acids, salt solutions, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">fuels</span>, acetones, ketones, etc., can be atomized (to convert a substance into very fine particles or droplets). Ultrasonic atomizing is carried out by focusing ultrasonic energy onto a liquid surface and by scattering liquid particles by the energy.</p>
<p>Vapor volume of a liquid is the number of cubic feet of vapor resulting from the complete evaporation of the liquid. The vapor volume depends on parameters of density, temperature, pressure and molecular weight which is affected by the variety of formulas for gasoline that is comprised of a wide range of hydrocarbons.</p>
<p>Using a common industrial formula: one liquid gallon = [(8.31) x (SG) x (387 cu ft)] / (MW) Where:</p>
<p>8.31 = pounds in a gallon of water<br />
SG = specific gravity of liquid being vaporized<br />
387 = At standard conditions, one pound-molecular weight of a material will evaporate to fill 387 cubic feet of space.<br />
MW= molecular weight of liquid being vaporized</p>
<p>Using the approximate gasoline constants:</p>
<p>One liquid gallon of gasoline = [(8.31 pounds in a gallon of water) x (.70 approx. specific gravity of gasoline) x (387 cu ft)] / (105 molecular weight of average gasoline) = 21.4 cubic feet of vapor volume. There is 7.481 U.S. gallons in one cubic foot. Therefore one liquid gallon of gasoline = (21.4 cubic feet) x (7.481) = 160.4 gallons of saturated gasoline vapor. The vapor volume will vary based on the specific formulation of gasoline, pressure, and temperature. Ultrasonic nebulizer technology makes it possible to convert 1 gallon of gasoline into 160 gallons of highly combustible fuel.</p>
<p><strong>How an ultrasonic nebulizer works to convert a liquid to gas.</strong></p>
<p>Using an ultrasonic nebulizer, liquids in a vessel (such as a fuel tank) sit on top of a vibrating element. and a high intensity ultrasound is omitted. As waves move through the liquid, the liquid will begin to be pushed upward, making a small fountain. Off the surface of this fountain small particles will begin to float above the liquid and appear like smoke. This smoke like appearance is actually very fine vapor. If gasoline was used in this process the small particles that would appear like smoke would be very fine gas vapor. To move the very fine particles a small air flow/gas or vacuum is needed &#8211; like a small fuel pump or the vacuum that exists in all combustion engines.</p>
<p>Is the ultrasonic nebulizer technology to convert liquid gasoline into a more abundant (160 times more) vapor gas safe to use? A fog machine reveals that it is safe as a fog machine is a device which emits a dense vapour that appears similar to fog. This artificial fog is most commonly used in professional entertainment applications. Typically, <strong>fog is created by vapourizing</strong> proprietary <strong>water</strong> and glycol-based or glycerine-based fluids <strong>or through the atomization of mineral oil</strong>. <strong>Mineral oil is liquid petroleum</strong> which is a liquid by-product of the distillation of petroleum to produce gasoline and other petroleum based products from crude oil. If a fog machine can safely and effectively atomize mineral oil &#8211; a by-product of oil &#8211; then a similar device like an ultrasonic nebulizer can also safely and effectively atomize 1 gallon of gasoline to produce 160 gallons of gasoline vapor.</p>
<p>Who said the reason for high gas prices was because the World is running out of oil? George W. Bush did on <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/05/news/bush_ethanol/index.htm" target="_self">March 5th 2008</a> ~ &#8220;<em>We gotta get off oil, American has got to change its habits,&#8221;.. &#8220;It should be obvious to all, demand has outstripped supply, which makes prices go up.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><object width="470" height="297" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F32SkcNlBxI?fs=1&amp;showinfo=0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="470" height="297" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F32SkcNlBxI?fs=1&amp;showinfo=0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
<p>President Obama asked Americans in an <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7831643/BP-oil-spill-Barack-Obamas-speech-in-full.html" target="_self">Oval Office address</a> to accept that the United States is running out of places to drill for oil. President Obama said in his first live televised address from the Oval Office that: &#8220;<em>For decades we have known the days of cheap and accessible oil were numbered. For decades we&#8217;ve talked and talked about the need to end America&#8217;s century long addiction to fossil fuels and for decades we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>The US government&#8217;s claim that the World is running out of oil was made to drive up the prices. Higher gas prices means bigger profits for US oil companies. Just look at the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2011/index.html" target="_self">Fortune 500 list</a> &#8211; <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2011/snapshots/387.html">Exxon Mobil</a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2011/snapshots/385.html">Chevron</a> and <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2011/snapshots/327.html">ConocoPhillips</a> are number 2, 3 and 4 respectively. We are not running out of oil we are being fleeced by the oil companies. With the technology readily available today &#8211; specifically liquid to gas vapor technology &#8211; they are also wasting oil.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Governments and the national oil companies are obviously controlling about ninety per cent of the assets. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Oil remains fundamentally a government business</span>. While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies, even though companies are anxious for greater access there, progress continues to be slow.&#8221; ~ Dick Cheney </em>speech at the Institute of Petroleum Autumn lunch, 1999.</p>
<p>If you were to incorporate this vaporizing technology into the manufacturing of a new ultra fuel efficient car those cars could travel a hundred time farther on one gallon of liquid fuel. On average the fuel efficiency of most cars on the road today is approximately 20 mpg. 20 mpg x liquid to vapor conversion factor of 160 = 3200 mpg.</p>
<p><img alt="vacuum fuel vapor system" src="http://kincaids.ca/301/fuelreducer/2011/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/vacuum_fuel_vapor_system.jpg" width="470" /><br />
<em>Design by Paul W Kincaid, editor of frenergy.ca</em></p>
<p>You can also convert liquid fuel into a vapor simply by modifying the gas tank. You don&#8217;t need to drill or cut into the gas tank at all.  You need only to remove and replace the fuel pump / fuel sending unit with a vacuum line and a filtered air intake line that is attached to an aerator you install on the bottom of the gas tank and have it vacuum the accumulated fuel vapor from the top inside of the tank. The filtered air intake (install a check valve between the filter and gas tank to only allow one way air flow to the tank) draws in oxygen into the bottom of the gas tank through the air intake line and attached aerator. The aerator creates very tiny air bubbles that attracts liquid fuel molecules as it rises to the surface of the liquid fuel. Once the air bubbles breaks the surface of the liquid fuel it becomes a gas vapor. This gas vapor is then sucked up (vacuumed) into the vacuum fuel line and feed into the gas combustion engine. This fuel aerator functions much like an aquarium aerator which are used worldwide to oxygenate a fish tank.</p>
<p><img alt="2 gallon air compressor tank" src="http://www.ridetech.com/store/images/detailed/0/tank1.jpg" width="460" /></p>
<p>You can also add a secondary tank to the system and have the engine vacuum draw the gas vapor from it. You could use a mass produced air compressor type tank as the gas vapor collecting and feed tank. They are already made to withstand very high pressures and the tank will act like a reserve tank when the engine is off. This way you will always have a good supply of gas vapor to draw upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frenergy.ca/technology-available-today-to-convert-1-gallon-of-liquid-gasoline-into-160-gallons-of-highly-combustible-fuel-vapor.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heat your home more efficiently with less wood and produce less pollution.</title>
		<link>http://frenergy.ca/heat-your-home-more-efficiently-with-less-wood-and-produce-less-pollution.html</link>
		<comments>http://frenergy.ca/heat-your-home-more-efficiently-with-less-wood-and-produce-less-pollution.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W Kincaid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting Off Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenergy.ca/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to know how you can heat your home using 80% to 90% less wood and exhaust nearly pure steam and CO2?   The technology has existed since the Great Depression to heat your home more efficiently using less wood and produce less pollution.  It is the cleanest and most sustainable way to heat a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/stop-wood-costs.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-568" title="stop wood costs" src="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/stop-wood-costs.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="445" /></a></p>
<p>Want to know how you can heat your home using 80% to 90% less wood and exhaust nearly pure steam and CO2?   The technology has existed since the Great Depression to heat your home more efficiently using less wood and produce less pollution.  It is the cleanest and most sustainable way to heat a conventional home. Some people have heated their home with nothing more than the dead branches that fall off the trees in their yard.  You can make your own simply by modifying your existing wood stove and making it into a wood gas generator.  What is a wood gas generator? A wood gas generator is a gasification unit which converts timber into cleaner burning wood gas.</p>
<p>This wood gasification technology is currently being used and marketed in a mini version, <em>as a camping Wood Gasification Stove</em>.  Camping wood gasification stoves use very little wood and because they have a closed carbon cycle, contribute less to global warming.  Wood gasifier stoves can be relatively easily fabricated using materials on hand.  They are far cleaner burning than a standard wood stove as they produce little if any soot.  The main attraction is that you can use your existing wood stove and make it more efficient, using less wood.</p>
<p><img title="Rocket Stove" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Rocket_stove.png/220px-Rocket_stove.png" alt="" width="220" height="257" /></p>
<p>A larger version is currently being marketed as a rocket stove.  It is an efficient cooking stove using small diameter wood fuel which is burned in a simple high-temperature combustion chamber containing an insulated vertical chimney which ensures complete combustion prior to the flames reaching the cooking surface.  A rocket stove achieves efficient combustion of the fuel at a high temperature by ensuring a good air draft into the fire.  Rocket stoves are already being used for cooking purposes in many third-world nations as well as for space and water heating.</p>
<p>You can convert your existing wood stove into a more efficient and cleaner burning wood gasifier stove incorporating the same principles as the camping wood gasification stove and the Rocket Stove.  Simply by adding extra stove pipes inside your wood stove, like the above image, you can convert your wood stove into a more efficient stove &#8211; using less wood and producing less pollution.</p>
<p>The accompanying article image is of a truck brake drum which you can &#8220;recycle&#8221; and use to create an updraft air flow.  They are made of cast iron so they will withstand the high heat produced by the wood gasification.   They already have pre-drilled holes for air injection.</p>
<p>The key to wood gasifiers is air flow.  The only reason why wood burning stoves produce smoke and pollution is that the fire in the wood stove isn&#8217;t getting enough air to burn completely.  Wood gasifier stoves are made to inject air right into the smoke column so that all the smoke burns instead of escaping.</p>
<p>Wood gasifier stoves give people a way to use wood far more efficiently.  Burning less wood means burning less money on heating costs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frenergy.ca/heat-your-home-more-efficiently-with-less-wood-and-produce-less-pollution.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water is too essential to all life on Earth to waste even 1 drop of it on gas or oil</title>
		<link>http://frenergy.ca/water-is-too-essential-to-all-life-on-earth-to-waste-even-1-drop-of-it-on-gas-or-oil.html</link>
		<comments>http://frenergy.ca/water-is-too-essential-to-all-life-on-earth-to-waste-even-1-drop-of-it-on-gas-or-oil.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W Kincaid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting Off Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kincaids.ca/frenergy/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You and everyone else in the World needs fresh water to live. Water is essential for sustaining all life on Earth. Gas and oil are not. Fresh water is in very limited supply. We can&#8217;t afford to use even 1 drop of it on gas and oil exploration, fracturing, pumping or refining. When the streams, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Environmentally-friendly.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-95" title="Environmentally unfriendly" alt="" src="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Environmentally-friendly.jpg" width="480" height="331" /></a></p>
<p>You and everyone else in the World needs fresh water to live. Water is essential for sustaining all life on Earth. Gas and oil are not. Fresh water is in very limited supply. We can&#8217;t afford to use even 1 drop of it on gas and oil exploration, fracturing, pumping or refining. When the streams, rivers and lakes go dry man, animal and plant life will die.</p>
<p>The decision as to whether or not we allow our governments to give away Earth&#8217;s essential life giving and life sustaining limited supply of water to greedy, selfish and corrupt gas and oil companies is simple. The answer is and will always be NO. Not a drop of it.</p>
<p>Use the very limited supply of fresh water for gas and oil and you, your family, your neighbours, your friends, co-workers, pets, livestock, crops, flowers, grass, tress, fish, deer, moose, bears and all other plant and wildlife will die.</p>
<p>Even if there was no more gas or oil left on Earth, man, animal and plant would live on – so long as there is still fresh water to drink.</p>
<p>One 8 oz glass of fresh drinking water is enough to keep you alive for hours or even days. How far will you get on one 8 oz of gas or oil? Will that gas or oil keep you alive after the streams, rivers and lakes have been drained dry?</p>
<p>Our governments spends $billions each year on space exploration. Why are they spending so much money? What is the purpose of these space missions? To find planets with water. They aren&#8217;t looking for oil or gas on Mars, they are looking for water. Water is so precious and in such limited supply today that we are now forced to look off World for it.</p>
<p>If we allow the gas and oil companies to use any of Earth&#8217;s limited supply of fresh water we (those of us who haven&#8217;t already died because of lack of fresh water) will one day be forced to abandon Earth and make the long and very dangerous journey to another in search of what we need to survive as a human race – water.</p>
<p>We are not ready to make that journey now or for another 100 years. We do not have the technology to build the massive Arks that we will need to take us to a new home. We do not have the technology to survive the journey. We would have to take enough fresh water and oxygen for each crew member to survive the journey. So today and every day until such time as we do possess the technology to make the journey to a new home World we must protect, at all costs, what little water we have now.</p>
<p>No amount of gas or oil is worth destroying all life on Earth. No amount of gas or oil is worth making man and all animal and plant life extinct. Water is essential to our existence. As it is essential and finite water is priceless. So the next time a politician (who has been undoubtedly bribed by the gas and oil companies) tells you that if you agree to give up this life sustaining supply of fresh water you&#8217;ll have access to cheap gas and oil, you&#8217;ll know they&#8217;re lying. Priceless means it is so valuable you can&#8217;t put a price on it. Water is so valuable we can&#8217;t afford to use 1 drop of it for gas or oil exploration, fracturing, pumping or refining. If we do, life on Earth will quickly cease to exist.</p>
<p>Ever wonder what Earth would look like with no water? Just look up at the Moon and you&#8217;ll have your answer. The Moon is a constant reminder of what will happen if we use up the priceless, precious, and limited supply of fresh water. The Moon is grey because it is dead. Why do you think we never went back to the Moon. A dead Moon has no value. If there was water on the Moon we&#8217;d already be inhabiting it. Because there is no water it isn&#8217;t worth spending any amount of money on going back to it. That is why we have been focusing on Mars. That is why we are now sending more probes to Mars. Mars has water and therefore is of great value to mankind. The distance to Mars makes it even more valuable.</p>
<p>No water on Earth will also mean no oxygen. No oxygen means no atmosphere. No atmosphere means a dead planet that looks exactly like the Moon.</p>
<p>For those of you who just don&#8217;t give a damn because this will probably not affect them in their lifetime, you couldn&#8217;t be more wrong. The same day 1 gas or oil company starts drilling a chain reaction starts. Within weeks of drilling streams, rivers and lakes will start to dry up. Those streams, rivers and lakes feed the underground water table and once the surface water dries up wells will quickly dry up too. Even before that happens the dried up streams, rivers and lakes will immediately impact all wildlife in their vicinity. They will be the first to die off, in great numbers.</p>
<p>Without streams, rivers and lakes farming will cease as there will be no water to feed livestock or irrigate crops. Farmers and country folks will be forced to abandon their properties because there is no well water to drink, cook or wash with. Surrounding villages and towns will also be forced into being abandoned as water no longer flows through them.</p>
<p>Once farmers are forced out of the business of growing our food, the food supply will be drastically reduced. We all know what food shortages means. Skyrocketing food prices. And that will affect the cost of living for everyone on Earth. So you see, no water means no food and no food or water means you and everyone else (including those who don&#8217;t give a damn) die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frenergy.ca/water-is-too-essential-to-all-life-on-earth-to-waste-even-1-drop-of-it-on-gas-or-oil.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Replicating Nikola Tesla’s electric car technology would end oil dependency forever.</title>
		<link>http://frenergy.ca/replicating-nikola-teslas-electric-car-technology-would-end-oil-dependency-forever.html</link>
		<comments>http://frenergy.ca/replicating-nikola-teslas-electric-car-technology-would-end-oil-dependency-forever.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W Kincaid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting Off Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kincaids.ca/frenergy/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikola Tesla removed the gasoline engine of a 1931 Pierce-Arrow automobile and replaced it with an electric motor.  Using only freely available energy he extracted from the air, using an antenna and a black box, Telsa was able to power the car and drive it for hours and at speeds of up to 90 mph. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_54" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Libyan-gold-heist.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-54" title="Libyan gold heist" alt="" src="http://frenergy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Libyan-gold-heist.jpg" width="480" height="330" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">U.S. / NATO attacked Libya to steal the country’s vast oil resources and its 144 tons of gold bullion,</p></div>
<p>Nikola Tesla removed the gasoline engine of a 1931 Pierce-Arrow automobile and replaced it with an electric motor.  Using only freely available energy he extracted from the air, using an antenna and a black box, Telsa was able to power the car and drive it for hours and at speeds of up to 90 mph. Not a drop of petrol was used. Wouldn’t it be nice if we could replicate the accomplishment?  Imagine how his technology would benefit mankind.  First off Tesla’s electric car technology would end oil dependency.  It would end global warming.  It would end smog and all the diseases associated with smog and pollution.  If his technology was already the backbone of society the BP and Exxon Mobil oil spills would never have occurred.  The wars of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya would never have occurred.  The glaciers would still be home to thousands of now endangered species.  Mankind would be saved.</p>
<p>In the summer of 1931, Nikola Tesla along with his nephew Peter Savo, installed a box on the front seat of a brand new Pierce-Arrow touring car at the company factory in Buffalo, New York. The box is said to have been 24 inches long, 12 inches wide and 6 inches high. Connected to it were a 1.8 meter long antenna and two ¼ inch metal rods. Inside the box was reputed to be some dozen vacuum tubes — 70-L-7 type — and other electrical parts. Two wire leads ran from the box to a newly-installed 40 inch long, 30 inch diameter AC motor that replaced the gasoline engine.</p>
<p>“As the story goes, Tesla inserted the two metal rods and announced confidently, “We now have power” and then proceeded to drive the car for a week, “often at speeds of up to 90 mph.”  The “converter” box used in the 1931 demonstration could generate enough electrical energy to also power the lights in a home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frenergy.ca/replicating-nikola-teslas-electric-car-technology-would-end-oil-dependency-forever.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
